A2 Hosting vs BlueHost

A2 Hosting

BlueHost

Rating
Plan in review SwiftBasic
Price before discount $10.99/month$7.99/month
Price (12-mo) $10.99 / month$7.99 / month
Price (24-mo) $4.90 / month$3.95 / month
Website https://www.a2hosting.comhttps://www.bluehost.com
Special Discount 51% off on first billSpecial price - $2.95/mo hosting
Promo Code WHSR(Link Activate)
Review
Summary

The best thing about A2 Hosting is speed. By introducing SSD storage, Railgun Optimizer, and pre-configured server caching to its customers, A2 is raising the speed standard of the entire shared hosting industry.

BlueHost is recommended by WordPress.org and a popular hosting choice since early 2000. We think BlueHost may be the right call for the small businesses and individual bloggers who want a budget hosting solution..

Basic features

Data Transfer UnlimitedUnlimited
Storage Capacity Unlimited50 GB
Control Panel CpanelCpanel
Extra Domain Reg. $14.95/yr for .com domain; prices vary for different TLDs.$11.99/yr for registration, $15.99/yr for renewal
Private Domain Reg. $9.95/year$14.88/year
Auto Script Installer Softaculous One Click Install (powered by Mojo Market Place)
Custom Cron Jobs YesYes
Site Backups YesFree Basic Backup; BlueHost CodeGuard Backups cost $35.88/year.
Dedicated IP $48/year$5.99/year
Free SSL Let's EncryptLet's Encrypt
Built-in Site Builder A2 Website BuilderWeebly Website Builder

Quick Review

Pros
Reliable server, hosting uptime above 99.98%
Well-optimized for best performance, TTFB < 550ms
Reasonable rates and signup discount
Anytime money back guarantee
Free websites migration for first time customers
Choice of 4 different server locations
Special discount - Save 51% on your first bill
Pros
Solid server performance - Hosting uptime > 99.95%
Good server speed - TTFB below 500ms
Comprehensive self-help documents and video tutorials
Full account daily backup and restoration
Ease of use - Newbie-friendly control panel
Flexibility – upgrade to VPS and dedicated hosting
Cons
Site migration chargeable when you downgrade
Live chat support isn't always available
A2 Turbo Plan does not support Ruby or Python
Cons
Expensive renewal fees - 100% Price jump after first term
Unlimited hosting service limited by various server usage constraints and policies
Most server upgrades and additional features are costly





FTC Disclosure: WHSR receives referral fees from hosting companies listed on this website. Our opinions are based on real experience and actual hosting service data. Please read our review policy to understand how we rate a web host.





A2 Hosting vs BlueHost: What We Think

Commentary by WHSR Staff, Timothy Shim

I often feel it is a little unfair to compare most web hosting providers to A2 Hosting since they stand quite far above the competition. This stands out a little further given my slight bias towards EIG-owned sites, which BlueHost is today.

A2 Hosting: Better Hosting Performance

For those who are still unfamiliar with A2 Hosting, the offer a rock-solid combination of powerful performance and flexibility in very competitively priced packages. The performance of sites on their plans regularly clock in at sub-550ms speeds with a good uptime track record.

Speed tests using Bitcatcha

A2 Hosting Speed TestRecent A2 Hosting speed test results.

BlueHost Hosting Speed TestRecent BlueHost speed test result.

Feature-wise, there are a lot of similarities between A2 Hosting and BlueHost at similar price points. Yet the devil, as they say, is in the details. There are some critical shortcomings in BlueHost plans that unfortunately makes it fall behind in performance compared to A2 Hosting.

The first reason for A2 Hosting’s speed advantage is its Turbo server option which it claims can help sites load pages up to 20x faster. It also has unique customized in-house optimization and lets its users have flexibility in server locations. This can make another big difference, especially for sites that are regional-specific or targeted.

These are major features in an industry that must compete neck to neck on technology points. You might say one has SSD and another has not for example, but there no real way to overcome a tried and tested feature such as custom optimization on Turbo A2 Hosting servers.

BlueHost: Recommended by WordPress.org

Another holy grail in web hosting is making sure your site remains safe and recoverable in case of any disaster. Here it’s worth noting that BlueHost CodeGuard Backups cost $35.88/year. While this might not be a major price to pay for safety, it is still a line item to be added to your overhead.

Truly speaking anything I add on here will be nit-picking but there is also a difference in the kind of script installers that each use. A2 Hosting makes use of the widely-recognized Softaculous script installer while BlueHost uses an installer powered by Mojo Market Place.

While this may not seem like a major difference, users tend to be comfortable with widely used software that’s powerful and easy to use. Say for example the reason so many sites today run WordPress. There’s no real reason why BlueHost should rock the boat for its users here.

With a paltry dollar or so as a difference in sign-up pricing, A2 further pulls ahead with its anytime money-back guarantee and lower renewal prices at the end of contract.

Final Thoughts

This is not to say that BlueHost is a terrible web hosting service provider, especially since it’s officially still an officially recommended WordPress.org host. However, when it comes to a comparison between these two big names in the business, I can find no option but to recommend A2 Hosting.

To learn more and order




Most-Searched Comparisons