BlueHost vs SiteGround



Plan in review BasicGrowBig
Price before discount $7.99/month$19.95/month
Price (12-mo) $7.99 / month$19.95 / month
Price (24-mo) $3.95 / month$5.95 / month
Website https://www.bluehost.com
Special Discount Special price - $2.95/mo hosting65% one-time discount
Promo Code (Link Activate)-

BlueHost is recommended by and a popular hosting choice since early 2000. We think BlueHost may be the right call for the small businesses and individual bloggers who want a budget hosting solution..

SiteGround is a reliable hosting company with innovative server features and solid hosting performance. Their price is a little steep at renewal but you'll get what you paid for. We think SiteGround shared hosting is suitable for both new and experienced users who want a worry-free hosting solution.

Basic features

Data Transfer UnlimitedUnlimited
Storage Capacity 50 GB20 GB
Control Panel CpanelCpanel
Extra Domain Reg. $11.99/yr for registration, $15.99/yr for renewal$15.95/yr for .com domain; prices vary for different TLDs.
Private Domain Reg. $14.88/year$12/yr
Auto Script Installer One Click Install (powered by Mojo Market Place)Softaculous (incl. 320+ apps)
Custom Cron Jobs YesYes
Site Backups Free Basic Backup; BlueHost CodeGuard Backups cost $35.88/year.Yes
Dedicated IP $5.99/yearYes, $30/yr
Free SSL Let's EncryptLet's Encrypt
Built-in Site Builder Weebly Website BuilderYes

Quick Review

Solid server performance - Hosting uptime > 99.95%
Good server speed - TTFB below 500ms
Comprehensive self-help documents and video tutorials
Full account daily backup and restoration
Ease of use - Newbie-friendly control panel
Flexibility – upgrade to VPS and dedicated hosting
Extremely reliable – 100% host uptime at most times
Free site migration for new users
Choice of server locations in three continents
Free let’s Encrypt Standard & Wild Card SSL
Innovative - Full SSD, HTTP/2, Built-in Cacher, NGINX, etc
Save 60% on your first bill
Best for WordPress and Drupal websites
Positive feedback from other SiteGround users
Expensive renewal fees - 100% Price jump after first term
Unlimited hosting service limited by various server usage constraints and policies
Most server upgrades and additional features are costly
Hosting price increases after first bill
Mixed results in our server speed test
Instant backup not available for StartUp and GrowBig
No live chat support for technical and billing issue

FTC Disclosure: WHSR receives referral fees from hosting companies listed on this website. Our opinions are based on real experience and actual hosting service data. Please read our review policy to understand how we rate a web host.

BlueHost vs SiteGround: What We Think

Commentary by WHSR Staff, Timothy Shim

Hosting sites since 2003, BlueHost today has grown into one of the grand-daddies of the business and is perhaps one of the few sites worth comparing to SiteGround. They both have impressive track records and Jerry does in fact host his personal blog with SiteGround.

SiteGround: Innovative Company

Over the years, SiteGround has pused forward several innovations in their service which includes their SuperCacher which helps its users optimize the performance of their sites. Although self-developed initiatives such as this are popular among a handful of top web hosting providers, others such as BlueHost are catching up in terms of standard technology such as the use of SSD storage.

Yet I feel that because of the longer innovation lead that SiteGround has, it still edges just that tiny bit ahead in its offerings. For example, sometime last year SiteGround started offering a new AI-based anti-bot solution to its users that help increase the security of their account. Think of it as like something like WordFence, without having to install the plugin on your site.

Yet despite these innovative add-ons that are coming from SiteGround, somehow BlueHost has still managed to keep up in performance offering an impressive TTFB of less than 500ms. This is a good response time in the industry and while SiteGround can meet and exceed those numbers, the performance is slightly more erratic.

Good Uptime Reliability for Both

Compare Siteground uptime with BlueHost
SiteGround Uptime (August 2018): 100%.

Compare BlueHost uptime with SiteGround
BlueHost Uptime (July 2018): 100%.

Thankfully though, both do well in uptime reliability with BlueHost lagging only slightly behind SiteGround’s 100% at 99.95% uptime. Nothing less than what one would expect from two top names in the business.

They are also both incredibly good for new users to latch on to in different ways. BlueHost has a wide range of self-help documentation and an intuitive user interface, while SiteGround will help new users migrate to its servers for free.

Nothing in this world is perfect however, and both do come with their own quirks as well. What I feel is slightly annoying with SiteGround is that it doesn’t offer live chat support for technical and billing issues. BlueHost makes itself a bit of a nuisance with constant upsells for more features which can be quite pricey.

Nevertheless, either of these hosts would be a great choice on so many levels that it can be hard to choose. I’d say that either/or is fine for a wide range of users since they hit many key issues on the head with their offered plans and scalability.

To learn more and order

Most-Searched Comparisons