A2 Hosting vs SiteGround: What We Think
Commentary by WHSR Staff, Timothy Shim
In a battle of the giants it is often difficult to discern who the winner will be and that is sort of the case we have between A2 Hosting and SiteGround. Both are very recognizable names in the web hosting business and have been around since the early 2000s.
A2 Hosting has stayed true to its roots in Ann Arbour, Michigan while SiteGround has spread out a little bit across a few countries, but both offer server choices in various key locations to their users – in the US, Europe and Asia.
A2 Hosting: Great Server Performance
In terms of performance, A2 as usual offers excellent TTFB of below 550ms but SiteGround speeds vary a little across various data centres. Availability is good with both offering uptimes well above industry standards.
Compare Speed Test Results at Bitcatcha
A2 Hosting speed test (server located in United States): A
SiteGround speed test (server located in Singapore): A
It is a little puzzling about SiteGround performance since they apparently offer full SSD, HTTP/2 with built-in cache and more. Perhaps the difference lies in A2 Hosting’s famed Turbo server and custom optimization. The only major drawback we can see from the setup is that A2 Hosting’s Turbo servers don’t support Ruby on the Rails or Python.
While we used to complain a little about A2 not having a stable and always available live chat support service, SiteGround seems to improve on that a little. It offers 24/7 live chat, BUT, do note that is sales support, not for technical issues.
What does make me more comfortable with both of these hosts is that their business practices seem very much above board. They have solid customer feedback and anytime money back guarantees to back the fees they are changing.
SiteGround: Steep Renewal Fee
Expect to pay a little more above the industry norm for A2, but significantly higher than that (almost double) for SiteGround. Thankfully, if you opt for a longer buy-in period those fees drop by a lot. I feel that there is no issue with the long term buy in if you couple that with the anytime money back guarantee.
What I do feel slightly unhappy about is the rather steep renewal fee that SiteGround users will be looking at. I feel that $19.95 is a little steep for a plan to renew at, especially for standard shared hosting.
With advantages to long term buy-in pricing and solid reputations and infrastructure, either of these hosts would be a good choice. However, I feel that more advanced users and business owners will benefit more as the will be able to take full advantage of the enhanced features both these hosts offer.
To learn more and order